AfFS Responds to BTC’s Hypocrisy

Once again, the Business Travel Coalition (BTC) has shown that its hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Since Americans for Fair Skies and our allies began our effort to safeguard U.S. jobs and promote fair competition in international aviation, the Business Travel Coalition has tried to distract from the fundamental point by making arguments that have nothing to do with the issue at hand. More than $50 billion in subsidies have been provided to the state airlines of Qatar and the UAE over the past decade with the specific aim of undermining and driving out competition as these countries looked to establish new economies as the demand for fossil fuels declines. But the BTC would like you to ignore this evidence, because it is utterly inconvenient for their campaign promoting the subsidized state-owned Gulf carriers.

Generating American jobs is important, and is something that the aviation industry does by the millions. U.S. airlines create hundreds of thousands of American jobs to sustain travel across the world’s largest national airspace and abroad. When routes are lost or forgone, however, due to the dumping of capacity (seats) into the market by the subsidized UAE and Qatari carriers, jobs are lost, consumer choice is limited, and the marketplace is skewed. The seat dumping is a violation of U.S. trade laws. And when Qatar Airways, Emirates and Etihad partner with U.S. carriers like JetBlue and Alaskan Airlines, BTC cherry-picks employment data to divert from the fact that in context, the overall job loss in the U.S. is a significant net negative. When U.S. airlines are unable to compete on an even playing field in the international market, many more hard-working American aviation jobs are lost- up to 1,500 jobs per route exited or forgone to subsidized competition.

Fortunately for American trade policy, the U.S. aviation industry, and the millions of jobs the industry supports, the Business Travel Coalition is not responsible for holding our trade partners accountable. That is the role of the U.S. government and we expect them to act accordingly.

The problem is simple and so is the solution. Two of our trade partners – Qatar and the United Arab Emirates – are taking advantage of the aviation trade agreements they hold with the U.S. because America has never enforced these agreements. Their violations must stop. The time for enforcement and action by the U.S. is now. Americans for Fair Skies is heartened by President Trump’s focus and prioritization of creating and maintaining vital American jobs. Americans for Fair Skies calls on President Trump and his administration, including Secretaries Tillerson and Chao, to take action and enforce our Open Skies Agreements with Qatar and the UAE, restoring a level playing field for U.S. aviation workers.

americans4fairskies2015AfFS Responds to BTC’s Hypocrisy
read more

Crying the Blues at Emirates and Etihad

In recent weeks, we’ve seen Emirates Airline and Etihad Airways launch a clever PR ploy to persuade the media and public officials that they are real companies subject to the same financial constraints as other airlines.

But Emirates and Etihad assuredly are not. They are instruments of their governments, wholly owned by ruling families, with easy access to wheelbarrows of cash from their state treasuries. The Partnership for Open and Fair Skies, a coalition of American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and aviation trade unions, has proven that since 2004 Emirates, Etihad, and Qatar Airways have received more than $50 billion in direct and indirect subsidies and other unfair benefits from their government owners. Even if their crying the blues is genuine, the remedy for financial stress is simply to grab the wheelbarrows and shovel the cash. These airlines are far more than status symbols of tiny, rich places. They are essential elements in economic development strategies that seek to diversify the UAE economy and reduce dependence on the energy industry. There’s a lot at stake in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and to their leaders failure is not an option.

Some may simply dismiss this scheme as an ambitious business plan. But there’s an ever-present insidiousness in the Gulf airlines’ subsidized expansion strategy. First and foremost, the subsidies blatantly violate the Open Skies agreements the United States signed with their government owners. Second, they make it impossible for fair-playing businesses to compete, destabilizing the aviation industry as a whole – an industry that in the United States alone supports millions of jobs. And third, the UAE and Qatar strategy is all the more curious – and surely offensive to many – now that there is a new president who promised in his campaign to protect American workers and ensure that our trade deals are fair and enforced.

So there’s no doubt the blue skies are turning. A recent Bloomberg Businessweekfeature on Emirates noted a range of economic and other crosswinds. Profits for the first half of 2016 dropped 75 percent, and revenue actually declined. Emirates’ Chairman and Chief Executive, His Highness Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum, said “The bleak global economic outlook appears to be the new norm, with no immediate resolution in sight.” It’s handy to blame external factors. Truth is, Emirates’ hypergrowth and aggressive decisions have harmed it and destabilized the airline industry – not just in the Middle East, but worldwide. They have added tens of thousands of seats at a rate that far exceeds growth in actual passenger demand, even in fast-growing markets in Asia. And because the airline industry is a textbook example of the relationship between supply, demand, and price, pumping in too much supply has meant prices have fallen for all airlines, including the real ones. As a consumer, that might strike you as happy news, but in the medium and long term such an approach will damage every stakeholder, including passengers.

Skies are also graying at Etihad. Like Emirates, they have grown their airline far faster than has actual demand. Unlike Emirates, however, they have used huge chunks of state largesse to invest in other airlines: 49 percent of Alitalia, 49 percent of Air Serbia, 40 percent of Air Seychelles; 29 percent of Air Berlin, and others (nearly every country has laws preventing foreign owners from more than a 50 percent share). To airline experts, the investments in Alitalia and Air Berlin seem especially imprudent. Alitalia, once wholly state-owned, has lost money for decades; there was great optimism when in 2014 Etihad spent €560 million (about $602 million) for their stake, but the Italian airline has continued to lose lots of money, and last month announced discussions with Rome and institutional investors aimed at yet another restructuring. Air Berlin, a newer, private company, has lost millions in the past decade through giddy over-expansion, and has recently restructured and retrenched in an effort to survive. By any objective assessment, most of these Etihad investments have been failures, which was likely a factor in the recent announcement that longtime CEO James Hogan and CFO James Rigney will both depart in the second half of 2017.

And Mr. Hogan’s statement two weeks ago that Etihad would not add new destinations was disingenuous. Likely crafted – and interpreted in press reports – to appear to be a concession to the Trump administration, this observer read it more like an admission that they’ve now saturated the U.S. market with subsidized capacity, and need to take a hiatus. Furthermore, Mr. Hogan chose his words carefully: “We are not flying into any further points in the U.S.A.,” doesn’t mean they won’t continue to add more flights to the six U.S. gateways they already serve.

Curiously, Qatar Airways has not joined Emirates and Etihad in the bad-news chorus; indeed, just before New Year’s they published a cheerful recap of a successful 2016. Maybe their smiles are because they have the biggest subsidy wheelbarrow of all, accounting for more than half of the $50 billion in proven subsidies.

Sadly, this turmoil is not just something happening “over there.” The three Gulf mega-carriers’ subsidized massive expansion has real impact on U.S. airlines and their European joint-venture partners. The trio’s growth in the U.S. has and will continue to result in loss of U.S. jobs, harming airlines and communities across the nation. There’s a lot of rhetoric about protectionism, but U.S. airlines don’t need protection. Remember this: economic deregulation of a once state-controlled industry began here in the United States almost 40 years ago, and U.S. carriers have learned to compete, as long as the playing field is not tilted by subsidies and other unfair benefits. Last week, President Trump met with U.S. airline CEOs. He knew about the government subsidies, and, even better, he told the executives that he wanted to help U.S. carriers compete. That’s a step in the right direction.

Originally Published on Huffington Post.

americans4fairskies2015Crying the Blues at Emirates and Etihad
read more

Trump to meet with airline CEOs on Thursday: White House

U.S. President Donald Trump will meet with the chief executive officers of airlines on Thursday, the White House said, another in a series of meetings the new president has had with business leaders.

The White House statement on Friday did not say who would attend the breakfast and “listening session.” Last week, Trump met with the CEOs of the Big Three U.S. automakers and pressed them to bring more jobs to the United States. This week he met with pharmaceutical executives and called on them to make more drugs in the United States and cut prices.

Originally Published on Reuters.

americans4fairskies2015Trump to meet with airline CEOs on Thursday: White House
read more